>AFAIK, the TTL gets decremented by one by a router as it passes it on (if
>it's held under one second), or by the number of seconds it was held if it
>is held over one second.  I agree that anything more than 1000ms of delay
>seems outrageous for a single hop these days, but I don't know of anything
>that has changed that "rule" that both you and I describe.
>
>Mike W.

This is off the top of my head, but I think the changing of the rule 
to decrementing the hop count is in RFC 1812. TTL for fragment 
reassembly is a little different.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35518&t=35507
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to