I agree, the L3 card is a step back, back to the 6000 and the MSM. The SUPIII is like the MSFC, inter vlan x ... without having to build gig channels and all the BS.
Dave "R. Benjamin Kessler" wrote: > I haven't seen the Sup III for Cat4K's yet but I do have a bit of experience > with the L3 cards and am fairly unimpressed. After working with the 6500's > (with MSFCs) configuring a Cat4K with L3 module certainly seems like a few > steps backwards. My current client has a couple of Cat4K's with L3 modules > that we'll be replacing this year with 6509's and MSFCs. > > Last time I checked (perhaps this is different now) there were only three > different versions of IOS available for the L3 module; to make matters > worse, the code seemed to be written by the same group that writes 8540 > code - based-on my personal experiences with the 8540 platform this didn't > give me a high level of comfort. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Daniel Kekai > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 4006 with Sup III [7:37504] > > Hello, > > Is anyone out there running Cisco 4006's with the new Sup III? If so what > has been your experience with them? > > We are interested in using a pair of them as distribution switches with L3 > capabilities to run OSPF. I know the 4000's had problems with this before so > I was wondering if the new Sup III solved some of the old issues. > > Thanks in advance, > Daniel > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37581&t=37504 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
