If you disable synchronization, will it work fine? Scott H. wrote: > > Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since > they are not > directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static > route. > > ""Stanzin Takpa"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route > necessary, > either > > it is ebgp or ibgp? > > > > > > > > > > ROUTER-A > > interface Loopback0 > > ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > router bgp 400 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 > > ! > > ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.2 > > > > > > ROUTER-B > > interface Loopback0 > > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > router bgp 400 > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 400 > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source Loopback0 > > ! > > ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.1 > > > > > > > > Stanzin Takpa > >
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37733&t=37730 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
