That's a default route as I recall, not static for a specific prefix... -Julian
""Ouellette, Tim"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thought bgp had a gotcha where you couldn't start a neighbor relationship > based on a static route. > > I'm fairly confident that I remember this. It could be for ibgp only, or > maybe just for ebgp. > > You may want to take a look > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: BGP issue ??? [7:37730] > > > Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since they are not > directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static route. > > ""Stanzin Takpa"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route necessary, > either > > it is ebgp or ibgp? > > > > > > > > > > ROUTER-A > > interface Loopback0 > > ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > router bgp 400 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400 > > neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 > > ! > > ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.2 > > > > > > ROUTER-B > > interface Loopback0 > > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > router bgp 400 > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 400 > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source Loopback0 > > ! > > ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 10.10.10.1 > > > > > > > > Stanzin Takpa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37751&t=37730 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
