At 03:42 AM 3/15/02, Cisco Breaker wrote: >Excuse me for the configuration mistyping but before I had change my config >my access list was different than that . It belongs to another network ip >like 172.16.1.2. Anyway thanks for the correction. I want to make sure that >these priority or custom queuing methods are only used when congestion >happens. So I was thinking right.
I think Cisco recommends not using fancy queuing unless you are already experiencing congestion. Your best solution to avoid the slowness you mentioned may be to remove the priority queuing statements. >This group is great.. I always read this newsgroup but post occasionally. >But when you post you really get an answer. Knowledge sharing, great. I >remember those years that you cant find an answer and can't ask to anyone. >Stand by yourself , eat yourself. I love that! I've never heard that saying, but I'm going to use it now. ;-) >But now if you can't understand or can't >solve it, somebody might have done it before and can enlighten you. This is >rellay greatttt. > >Best regards, > >Cisco Breaker > > >""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Your access-list 150 and priority list say to make traffic from the > > firewall be highest priority. All other IP traffic appears to be the >lowest > > priority. But what traffic does your firewall actually send? > > > > The term firewall gets used to mean all sorts of things including proxy > > servers. But if your firewall is simply a device that examines packets and > > allows or doesn't allow, it is not the source IP address for most traffic. > > The source address is the end host client or server. > > > > Perhaps what you want is to change the list to all devices on the 10.1.1.0 > > network, rather than just the firewall. > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 03:41 AM 3/13/02, Cisco Breaker wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > > > >I have a question regarding priority groups. We have 2 firewalls. >10.1.1.2 > > >and 10.1.1.3. I am using 10.1.1.2 . But even if I am using 10.1.1.2 the > > >connection is slow as before. What is wrong with my config? Any answer >will > > >be highly appreciated. > > > > > >Best regards, > > > > > >Ciscobreaker, > > >CCNP,CCDP > > > > > >Router#sh run > > >Building configuration... > > > > > >Current configuration : 2121 bytes > > >! > > >version 12.1 > > >service timestamps debug uptime > > >service timestamps log uptime > > >service password-encryption > > >service udp-small-servers > > >! > > >hostname Router > > >! > > >enable secret 5 $1$J0OT$To6EJUMsXnNQN6v.yGy9R1 > > >enable password ak > > > > > >interface Ethernet0 > > > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > >! > > >interface Serial0 > > > bandwidth 128000 > > > ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 > > > priority-group 1 > > >! > > >interface Serial1 > > > no ip address > > >! > > >no ip classless > > >ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 > > > > > >no ip http server > > >! > > >no logging trap > > >access-list 150 permit ip host 10.1.1.2 any > > >priority-list 1 protocol ipx medium > > >priority-list 1 protocol pad normal > > >priority-list 1 protocol ip high list 150 > > >priority-list 1 default low > > >! > > > > > >line con 0 > > >line aux 0 > > >line vty 0 4 > > > password ak login > > >! > > >end > > ________________________ > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38439&t=38084 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
