Yeah, the DQoS on line sucked.  The sylvan test was so much easier thank
god.  I passed both and I'd never wish that test on anyone.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com


""Tim Medley""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just to be clear, neither of these two tests are a cert. There is a new
> Cisco Qualified Specialist Cert, for IP Telephony Support. It requires
> CIPT, CVoice, and DQoS. It also requires a CCNP. In essence it is a
> replacement fot the CCNP Voice specialization.
>
> CIPT and CVoice were recently revised (again). I took the last version
> of the tests and am preparing to take the latest version since that is
> what is required for the IP Telephony Support cert.
>
> Cisco Press has released both the CIPT and the CVoice class notes in
> book format, Cisco IP Telephony, ISBN 1587050501 and Cisco Voice over
> Frame Relay, ATM, IP, ISBN 1578702275.
>
> I am using both of these book and hands on experience to go take the new
> versions of the exams.
>
> The DQoS test is a beast. One of the CCIE's I know who works quite a lot
> with Voice and QoS failed the first time. It's pretty intensive and
> covers a lot. I'm scheduled to take the DQoS class next month, then I'll
> take the test.
>
> Tm
>
> Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice, CCDP
> Sr. Network Architect
> VoIP Group
> iReadyWorld
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> George Siaw
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CIPT and DQOS certs [7:38925]
>
> Your comments the exams please!
>
> George.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38934&t=38925
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to