What problems have you had with the Arrowpoint Sam? We do mainly Foundry for load balancing, and I have to say (as I'm not using my work e-mail address :-)) that they have been flaky as hell. We work fairly closely with Foundry (when we can get in touch), but every box seems to work differently with every image. You get in to the habit of finding an image that works and leave it alone. It's a horrible feeling when security advisories come out recommending upgrades, and you just know it's going to introduce other issues.
We haven't deployed the Arrowpoint on any really big projects, but they do seem to offer more functionality than the Foundry in some areas (not forgetting the massive price difference), so I'm interested to hear what problems have arisen with them. Thanks, Gaz ""sam sneed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a pair of CS11152 (former arrowpoints) and they've been flaky. I do > not recommend them. Not sure about coyotepoint. > > > ""dre"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Coyotepoint was the first server load balancing device I had ever > > heard of outside of your basic LSNAT configuration (I think Cisco > > calls it NAT load-sharing or something, but there is an RFC also). > > > > However, I've never actually seen one in production on any > > network. Around 1997-8 the Cisco Local Director was the > > only box I saw, and most people hated them. Then, the F5 > > Big/IP box became popular (and it still sort of is). A whole > > bunch of people started entering the market space of SLB > > and Global Load-Balancing. In the past few years, companies > > like Arrowpoint and Alteon got bought by Cisco and Nortel. > > Now you even have places like Akamai doing GLB for places > > like Yahoo. > > > > After I've read the RFC's, and patents like US6185598, > > US108703, and US6052718, and worked with SLB and > > GLB for years, I've finally come to a few conclusions: > > > > A) The SLB/GLB marketing and focus is silicon snake oil > > B) Just like the computer security industry, "[it's] like a carnival game, > > where people throw ducks at balloons, and nothing is as it seems" > > C) It really depends on *your* environment. Just as there are > > millions of options for web servers and web programming languages > > (e.g. .NET, J2EE, Apache+PHP+MySQL, Apache+mod_perl, MS NT4 > > IIS/ISAPI, WebSphere vs. Weblogic, Zeus, Netscape, Xitami, etc etc), > > there are millions of options for SLB and GLB (even deciding between > > the two is impossible). > > D) Even outside of products and software, you have your own organization. > > How the coders build web pages. How the HTML is done. Etc. If you > > don't have any dynamic content. If you are completely dynamic content and > > everything besides the main page is somewhere under /cgi-bin/. These are > > all organizational issues that are different with every company. > Depending > > on your setup, a different product may fit your needs differently. > > E) SLB was grown out of the need for more bandwidth being pushed out > > to the Internet by machines in the $100 to $5000 price range. These > > machines at the time were 486's and no ubiquitous Fast or Gigabit > Ethernet. > > For a high-end Unix box with Fast Ethernet, you were looking at $30,000 > > back then (at least). > > F) Now, you can buy a Titanium Powerbook with Gigabit Ethernet running > > Mach+BSD (MacOS X) for like $2000. You can get 2x CPU 1U machines > > running FreeBSD or Linux capable of pushing >2k pps for under $3000. > > The need for SLB may have changed over the years due to the hardware > > catching up to the bandwidth needs. > > > > The SLB/GLB market is so confusing, probably "nobody" has it figured out. > > > > However, I can recommend one box today that stands above the others, and > > the only one I'd like to see in any production network. The guys at > Radware > > have made some significant advancements in the way SLB and GLB are done. > > Their WSD and entire line of products are much better than any of the > > alternatives, and it is much more versatile for any real production > > environment. > > This is just my opinion, but I suggest you fully research the SLB/GLB > > industry before making your decision. > > > > -dre > > > > ""Brian Zeitz"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I hope this is not too far off topic, but has anyone ever used this > > > companies load balancers or products or have any feedback on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.coyotepoint.com > > > > > > > > > > > > One thing I noticed is that it only has 1 port in, and one out. Is that > > > not normal? I have used Alteon Before, any feedback would be helpful. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39157&t=38953 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
