Rik, if you don't mind my asking, which IOS release did you try for the 26xx? I am finding that things tend to change rapidly and in unexpected ways for newer releases, particularly since the release of 12.1
Reg ""Rik Guyler"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Mayo, I humbly must disagree with you. The 2600 series does indeed require > IP Plus. The newer 1700s (1721, 1760 probably) only require IP (I setup > trunking on a 1721 w/IP a couple of weeks ago), which makes them a perfect > choice for low-cost InterVLAN routing. > > I have attempted to use IP but found the necessary configs missing. > > Rik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mayo, Simer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > It should work with IP feature. IP Plus is not mandatory but recommended. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > So if I understand, a 2620 router with a Fast Ethernet intf. with IP Plus > feature set is reqd. to get trunking working, either isl or dotq....Is this > absolutely true that you need IP Plus....Has anyone got it working with just > > the IP feature set with ISL trunking? The reason I ask is the IP Plus > feature set requires more than 24Mb of mem. and I only have 24Mb on my > 2620....Moreover, there are no feature sets for 11.3x on Cisco's site. That > could have helped :-) > Thank you. > > > >From: "James Wilson" > >Reply-To: "James Wilson" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > >Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 10:35:59 -0500 > > > >I have a 1751 trunked to my c2924XL running IP/FW/IDS/PLUS/IPSEC/3DES and > >it > >only supports dot1q trunking on the 100Mb interface. Works like a champ, > >though. > > > >-- > >James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP > >Sr. Network/Security Engineer > >"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem" > >William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Rik Guyler > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >Another bit of good info to know: > > > >Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or > >Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to > >purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid > >the > >necessity of 2 or more E/FE interfaces. > > > >I just setup for a client a 1721 router which DOES support both trunking > >encapsulations and does it with IP only IOS! This is a huge savings over > >the traditional options for inter-VLAN routing. There are also new 1751 > >and > >1760 models which I believe also support both modes of trunks. > > > >Rik > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Larry Letterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 2:23 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >apparently last week some one on the list made the ethernets work > >in a 2600 router at 10mb.... > > > > > > > > > >Larry Letterman > >Cisco Systems > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:15 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788] > > > > > >Vlan trunking requires a fast ethernet connection. It cannot be trunked > >with a 261X. You'd need a 262X. > > > >If you have to deal with a 2611, your options become much more limited. > >You > >could replace the 2611 with a 2620. Or you could get a ethernet module for > >the 2611. Unfortunately, last time I checked (whish was a couple years > >ago, > >given) those ethernet modules came in two models, 1 and 4 port, and cost > >about $1000 per port. > > > >Another option would be to replace the 2611 with a 1750. It's got one fast > >ethernet port. If this network is as small as it sounds, it'd be a viable > >option. > > > >Oh, and about trunking, the way it works is you define the switch port > >connected to the router as a trunk. This allows multiple (in your case, > >all) vlans to use the one port. The router is configured with > >subinterfaces > >on the fastethernet port, one for each vlan. The router can then route > >between these vlans. > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39988&t=39788 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
