We have some Riverstones currently installed. We are trying to track issues with latency through the boxes. Also we have had issues with the ATM interfaces going to sleep. The cards shows up but do not pass any traffic. Riverstones is looking into it, but has not come up with a solution yet.
We are running OSPF on the boxes, but no BGP. I find the configuration of the boxes a big difference from Cisco. The CLI is somewhat the same, but different. We are working to replace the boxes with Cisco at this point because of the issues I mentioned above. We are using the 8600s and the 3000s. Debbie Westall --- Thomas Gainer wrote: > I have used them an find them to be good routers. > The configuration is a > little difference and some basic tasks like > modifying and interface can be > unnecessarily difficult, but in terms of > functionality, they provided what > was promised. I had few problems. Review your > requirements before you buy > one. Unlike Cisco, they do not try to fill every > niche. They also had some > problems with their BGP code. That seems to be > fixed though. > > Thomas Gainer > > ""Kevin Campbell"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > i was curious if anyone is familiar with > riverstone and what your opinions > > are. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type > application/ms-tnef which > had > > a name of winmail.dat] [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40256&t=40245 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
