"Michael L. Williams" wrote: > > "MADMAN" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have configured a few Flexwans with ATM and frame relay and they > > work quite well. If you have redundant sup/MSFC's I would recommend > > running SRM as opposed the config-sync on the MSFC's. > > > > Dave > > SRM -vs- config sync wouldn't be an issue if your running Native IOS, > correct? (Not trying to start a "Native -vs- Hybrid" thread, we just run > Native IOS and are looking at the same OC-3 rig)
You are correct, I ASSumed hybrid as it a the most common config running. I thought Cisco was going to push more toward Native but I don't see that happening yet though if your are using any OSM's you have to run native. On the other hand if you are planning on using voice modules they still require hybrid mode. job security... Dave > Tim, I can't say I've had first-hand experience with the situation you call > for, but if you can save $11K, reduce the amount of equipment, and take out > a routing hop in the process, I'd say go for it. As I mentioned above, > aside from the fact we're running Native IOS, we're looking at the OC-3 > modules for our 6509s to avoid going from the LS1010 to the 7500 then into > the 6500s... > > Mike W. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41994&t=41904 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
