In terms of LLQ, that's exactly what I recommend. As for the 46 instead of 6, in DiffServ, you have 64 "classes," and the higher the value, the more important the data is considered. In a converged network, your voice is the most important traffic because if you have a web page, a video and a voice conversation, you will notice imperfections/dropped packets in the voice before the web or even video (even SNA is more understanding than your ears).
The higher you prioritize the voice, the better in terms of QoS techniques and handling. 6 is low on the totem pole, and other apps may have marked themselves higher than 6, in which case the 6 class will be given less priority, which may be a bad thing during a congested link. With EF, you are assured a high classification. Steve ""Gene Volpe"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanx, Steve. I have since got more clarification on the whole CAR scenario > and someone recommended using LLQ instead. What do you think? Also, why do > you say to reprioritize from 6 to 46? What will that buy me? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43784&t=43757 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
