If you want good voice, then don't burst above CIR...otherwise, provider is allowed to throw away the packets...He has no idea which are voice and which are data. You absolutely don't want your voice packets dumped or your voice quality will suffer.
You should look at LLQ. Apply inside CBWFQ. Turn on traffic shaping on the frame interface. Apply your service policy to your FRTS map-class config. And again, shape down to prevent bursts (of course you need to get rid of that 0 CIR). Fundamentally, the benefits of frame are in direct contrast to good network design for voice. My 2 cents... Chris ""Gene Volpe"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a customer who needs to prioritze his voice over his frame relay > network. They have a PBX on each LAN and a switch that is setting the DSCP > bit in all the traffic coming from the PBX to a value of 6. > > I think it would be easy enough to just set up priority queueing with a > match on the DSCP field, but the customer is pushing for CAR. Anyone have > any feelings on the subject and if so, how would I configure the CAR, as far > as the bps rates go? The circuit has a CIR of 0 (I know, I know!!) and a > burst of a full T. > > Assume that they will not be upgrading the CIR. > > Thanx in advance, > -Gene Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43920&t=43757 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
