Another thing to think about:

    What IPX issues might arise if the router only has serial interfaces?



At 12:30 PM -0400 5/27/02, Chuck wrote:
>Fair? Why would you think it is not "fair?
>
>Consider that the command you give is straightforward and will indeed enable
>IPX routing. Now then, do you know what happens as a result of that command?
>Have you thought of this in terms of how an IPX network is numbered, and
>what an important and significant component of that numbering involves?
>
>Having done so, can you think of any reasons you might want to influence
>that component?
>
>Using your command ( which works fine ), if you were to do a "show IPX
>interface" what would you find?
>
>If you were to influence the MAC in some manner, and then were to do a "show
>IPX interface", now what would you find?
>
>Would one or the other be more useful in certain situations, say if you were
>trying to troubleshoot IPX routing or IPX connectivity?
>
>Fair?
>
>""Mike Sweeney""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  I have a IPX question in my CCNA practice test beta and I've had some
>mixed
>>  feedback on it. The questions asks what is the command to enable IPX
>routing
>>  on a router and gives a MAC address as part of the question. The question
>is
>>  a *fill in the blank* type.  The answer I have is:
>>
>>  ipx routing
>>
>>  Is making the MAC a requirement of the answer a *fair* use of the
command?
>I
>>  thought so even though IPX routing will automaticaly assign the node
>>  address. I felt inclusion of the MAC into the question was a clue that it
>>  needed to specified.  Is this too much to ask of a budding CCNA?
>>
>>  PS-  for those who would want to look at the entire beta, it's 60
>questions
>>  at this point and a free download.. as long as you use the feedback form
>to
>>  give me yes, no, it sucks etc..etc..  :) I have managed to get some good
>>  feedback so far and will always take more.
>>
>>  www.packetattack.com/tutorials.html
>>
>>  Thanks
>>
>>  MikeS




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45164&t=45138
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to