At 09:39 AM 5/27/02, Mike Sweeney wrote: >I have a IPX question in my CCNA practice test beta and I've had some mixed >feedback on it. The questions asks what is the command to enable IPX routing >on a router and gives a MAC address as part of the question. The question is >a *fill in the blank* type. The answer I have is: > >ipx routing
If you ask for a MAC address why is the answer ipx routing? It should be ipx routing followed by whatever MAC address you specified. If you're trying to get them to say that the command is still ipx routing even when you want to specify the MAC address, then that is just too tricky. >Is making the MAC a requirement of the answer a *fair* use of the command? I >thought so even though IPX routing will automaticaly assign the node >address. I felt inclusion of the MAC into the question was a clue that it >needed to specified. But you don't expect it to be specified if the answer is just ipx routing. >Is this too much to ask of a budding CCNA? The concept isn't too much, but the trickiness is. Priscilla >PS- for those who would want to look at the entire beta, it's 60 questions >at this point and a free download.. as long as you use the feedback form to >give me yes, no, it sucks etc..etc.. :) I have managed to get some good >feedback so far and will always take more. > >www.packetattack.com/tutorials.html > >Thanks > >MikeS ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45259&t=45138 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
