Hi Priscilla,

I used that book amoung others for the exam that I took recently. I did not
run into any switch configuration command questions on the test...only
switching theory..but that does not mean someone else might not get a
question like that. I guess it's my opinion that studying switch configs on
paper is sufficient for the CCNA exam. Although Odom goes into more detail
on many topics than is necessary for the exam...I'm glad I studied the
topics because it is helping me see the bigger picture as I study for the
BSCN exam.

In regards to the router sim...it does allow abbr. I used copy run start,
Ctrl+Z and en. However, the simulation is rather buggy. I had trouble
"telnetting" to the routers in the simulation. After trying various things
for about 15 minutes it finally worked. Also...it did not save my
configuration completely so I had to re-enter and do a copy run start a
couple of times.

I'm not sure about the Token Ring thing. Hope that helps.

Dain Deutschman
CNA, MCP, CCNA
Data Communications Manager
New Star Sales and Service, Inc.
800.261.0475
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I will be teaching a CCNA class next week. I've never taught an intro
class
> before. ;-) The textbook will be Wendell Odom's "Cisco CCNA Exam #640-607
> Certification Guide." I didn't choose it, but I'm fine with it. I have
some
> questions, however:
>
> Wendell covers Catalyst 1900 configuration in quite a bit of detail.
> Cisco's list of topics for 640-607 doesn't include this, so I'm not
> planning to teach it, and in fact, we won't have a switch in the lab
> probably. Will this be OK? Does anyone know if the 640-607 test has
> Catalyst 1900 configuration questions??
>
> Does anyone know if the test (which now includes router simulation
> questions) allows one to use abbreviations for commands? (such as cop run
> start instead of copy running-config startup-config)?
>
> Token Ring doesn't support multicast???? (He says this many times.) I know
> IEEE 802.5 does "officially" support it. I also know that many Token Ring
> NICs didn't support it in the early 1990s. Didn't they fix that??? I would
> have thought that Token Ring NIC vendors would have added support for
> multicast by now.....
>
> Thanks!
>
> Priscilla
>
> ________________________
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45494&t=45489
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to