Back in 1999, most vendor certs were pretty intolerant regarding the use of
abbreviations in answers to "fill-in-the-blank" syntax questions. I suspect
that had more to do with limitations of the testing software and the
overwhelming desire to not compensate people for the effort required to
rectify the situation rather than an insistence that people type thousands
of more characters than they need to in order to do their job.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:02 PM
Subject: teaching CCNA [7:45489]


> I will be teaching a CCNA class next week. I've never taught an intro
class
> before. ;-) The textbook will be Wendell Odom's "Cisco CCNA Exam #640-607
> Certification Guide." I didn't choose it, but I'm fine with it. I have
some
> questions, however:
>
> Wendell covers Catalyst 1900 configuration in quite a bit of detail.
> Cisco's list of topics for 640-607 doesn't include this, so I'm not
> planning to teach it, and in fact, we won't have a switch in the lab
> probably. Will this be OK? Does anyone know if the 640-607 test has
> Catalyst 1900 configuration questions??
>
> Does anyone know if the test (which now includes router simulation
> questions) allows one to use abbreviations for commands? (such as cop run
> start instead of copy running-config startup-config)?
>
> Token Ring doesn't support multicast???? (He says this many times.) I know
> IEEE 802.5 does "officially" support it. I also know that many Token Ring
> NICs didn't support it in the early 1990s. Didn't they fix that??? I would
> have thought that Token Ring NIC vendors would have added support for
> multicast by now.....
>
> Thanks!
>
> Priscilla
>
> ________________________
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45590&t=45489
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to