my results seem to disagree with your thought.
172.31.1.1 ---- loop0-------router----------WAN----------172.31.5.0 network
|
--------------WAN----------
172.31.3.0 network
the route-map I used went something like this
access-list 101 permit ip 172.31.5.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 172.31.5.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.3.0 0.0.0.255
route-map filter permit 10
match ip address 101
set interface null0
when I pinged from the 172.31.5.0 net to 172.31.3.0 net, the debug ip policy
showed packets matching the policy and being forwarded to null0
when I pinged from 172.31.1.1 there was no debug generated, and the
172.31.5.0 network received ICMP replies.
that's why I asked the question.
----- Original Message -----
From: ""Kris Keen""
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
Sent: Tuesday, 04 June, 2002 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Policy routing - directly connected interfaces [7:45628]
> You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
> by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined
for
> a remote desination that is directly connected or via a next hop would be
> routed and subject to your policy. This is strange.
>
> Ip local policy will only effect packets orginated by the router, this
> wouldnt effect the directly connected scenario.
> Perhaps you can add another match for packets going to a directly
connected
> interface to be subjected to the policy?
> I'd be intrested to see how you get on
""Kris Keen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
> by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined
for
> a remote desination that is directly connected or via a next hop would be
> routed and subject to your policy. This is strange.
>
> Ip local policy will only effect packets orginated by the router, this
> wouldnt effect the directly connected scenario.
> Perhaps you can add another match for packets going to a directly
connected
> interface to be subjected to the policy?
> I'd be intrested to see how you get on
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45807&t=45628
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
