There would probably need to be a post from a current 7000 owner, but a few a few years ago (Y2K) we upgraded many'a 7000 (I believe the 7010s included) from the SSP and RP combination to the RSP1.
@ the time it allowed for the 12.0 release and a 4 digit year. All the best Phil -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893] "Subsequently, software releases will be available for the Cisco 7000/7010 through Software Release 11.2 mainline. However, this will be the last release supported on the platform." from: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/7000/prodlit/615_pp.htm Gaz ""Kazan, Naim"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is off the topic but can you help me with what version of IOS is > support by the 7010 router. I was told before end of sale of 7010 router, > the highest ios version was 11.0. Is that correct or can I DL 12.0 version > to 7010 router. The router is for home lab use only. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: YASSER ALY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655] > > > Regardless of who is more financially secure, I would technically vote for > C&W. Having an overseas circuit from them I rarely faced troubles and even > when trouble happens their support is very fast and more important they > would say the truth and not start playing games with you. > > >Since I noticed a plug for another company I'll throw in my 2 cents. > > > >I'm not sure what services you are looking for but we offer quite a few and > >have a good global presence. While most company's are in piles of debt, we > >have a surplus of cash. Even after making acquisitions such > >as Exodus, we still sit on top. > > > >For your own comparison purposes: > >Here is a link to our Network maps showing our global infrastructure. > >http://www1.cw.com/template_05.jsp?ID=gn_network# > > > >Here is a link to our Internet backbone performance standards: > >http://www.sla.cw.net/ > > > >Thanks! > > > >Mike Munoz > >Network Engineer > >US Data GSOC Tier II > >Cable & Wireless > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Craig Columbus > >Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 10:55 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: OT: Who are the financially viable carriers? [7:47655] > > > > > >I know this probably isn't the best forum, but I thought I'd post it here > >since I'm sure some of you guys have insight and opinions... > > > >I've seen so many problems in the carrier market in the last few years that > >I'm no longer sure who to trust when they tell me that they're financially > >stable. > > > >Global Crossing is very weak. We all know about WorldCom/UUNET. Qwest is > >struggling. > > > >Who, in your experience, is still a stable, major player in the US carrier > >/ dedicated transmission market? > >Genuity? > >AT&T? > >Cable and Wireless? > >Time Warner Telecom? > > > >Who would be your first choice for carrier in today's economy? > > > >Craig > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47901&t=47893 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
