Hi Group, Thank you very much for your valuable comments, arguments and suggestions made on the above subject. It really helped me to reveal what is hiding at the customer premises.
In fact we had to bid for re-structuring the client's existing network equipment. The client continually insisted that they are having is individual T1's. Further, we couldn't get an opportunity to inspect the site and even the client couldn't reveal the type of current routers used..... bit tuff job. I had to forward some of the emails received from you'all to the client to convince them thay should be having T3's. Unfortuately the network was maintained by some third party and client was not too sure. However after some time, client confirmed that they are having T3's........instead of T1's, with some apologies...... In fact, this is first time I came across a requirement of 188 T1's to connect. That's why I check with the group to see whether somebody has done it before..:)) So thanks again roberts, craig, brian, chuck, howard, peter, mike, phillip and nrf for the valuable input you have given. Take care. ----------------------------------------- (on postoffice) The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire confidentiality clause. --------------------------------------------------------- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48081&t=47944 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
