But Dave, can we use a 2nd SUP III? I was under the inpression that Cisco-Cat doesnt allow a 2nd SUP III. It disables the blade if inserted. Cisco_Maniac
""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > That was a common approach back in the heydays of the 5500s!! No > spanning issues unless you disable spanning ;) > > Dave > > Mohsin Hussain wrote: > > > > I have two Cat5505 with Supervisor III with two GIGBIT uplinks on each > > switch. The Super IIIs do not support GIG EtherChannel. > > > > In order to address single point of failure between these switches, chould > I > > add another Super III on each switch and connect all the ports. Will this > > will create spanning tree issues. Also are there issues when connecting > > SuperIII uplinks to SuperIII uplinks? > > > > Can anyone suggest solution? > > > > Thanks > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50102&t=49530 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
