""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone using the new CSS11500 series switches yet? If so, do you have > any thoughts about them? We currently have the original CSS switch and > we need to upgrade. We were considering Array Networks and F5 but I'm > also interested in simply upgrading to the new CSS. It appears that > shortly Cisco will offer an SSL accelerator card for this box. However, > they won't offer a caching module. Get this....that's going to be a > network module for the 2600/3600 series routers! Odd... > > Anyway, have any of you toyed with these new switches yet?
I'd be interested to see how Radware's products compared against all of the above. The CSS 11500 does look interesting, however, I personally think Cisco's true win is the Cat6k CSM blade. Having a cache module for their low-end routers is pretty neat! The support for the CSS is becoming outstanding with Cisco backing the product. If you are needing to upgrade because of the scalability of the old CSS products, you should definitely look into the CSM. -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51551&t=51548 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
