have not used the new ones. I do like the fact they are coming out with an ssl module.
We also use F5 BigIP's. I like them alot, you may want to look into them. F5 has great tech support! Clayton ""dre"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Anyone using the new CSS11500 series switches yet? If so, do you have > > any thoughts about them? We currently have the original CSS switch and > > we need to upgrade. We were considering Array Networks and F5 but I'm > > also interested in simply upgrading to the new CSS. It appears that > > shortly Cisco will offer an SSL accelerator card for this box. However, > > they won't offer a caching module. Get this....that's going to be a > > network module for the 2600/3600 series routers! Odd... > > > > Anyway, have any of you toyed with these new switches yet? > > I'd be interested to see how Radware's products compared against all of > the above. The CSS 11500 does look interesting, however, I personally > think Cisco's true win is the Cat6k CSM blade. Having a cache module > for their low-end routers is pretty neat! The support for the CSS is > becoming outstanding with Cisco backing the product. If you are needing > to upgrade because of the scalability of the old CSS products, you should > definitely look into the CSM. > > -dre Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51554&t=51548 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
