Paul, Take plenty of time to understand the network design prior to making changes. If most all of networks are stub areas connecting to a central site there is no immediate rush to implement dynamic routing protocols. It also depends on the desktop protocols that are in place. For instance some dynamic protocols have features that make IPX easier to route than others. You might also find hidden issues, security, NAT, LAT, and others. Its sort of like... "Call before you dig!"
Have fun, Tim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul" To: Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: static routing [7:51599] > Hi guys, > > I have recently inherited a 30+ strong network that only uses static > routing!!! Some of the equipment includes 2900s 3500s 3600s 4000s amongst > others. I would very much like to move towards dynamic routing!!! What would > you guys suggest? I also believe that the next IOS for the 4006s does not > support EIGRP !!!!! (If i am correct!) > > I am not sure if I should use RIP IGRP etc. Have any of you guys experienced > this before and what would you suggest? > > Kind regards > > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51607&t=51599 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
