If you have a reasonably static network address wise, and few parallel paths in the network, maybe static routing is the best choice. I would stick with Chuck on this one and work on figuring out what problem you are trying to solve by introducing complexity into the network.
Protocol wise, I might suggest anything other than (e)IGRP simply because of its proprietary nature. I have spent a good part of my career migrating networks out of EIGRP toward something standard to support multi vendor networks which are less and less uncommon. Pete At 08:54 PM 8/18/2002 +0000, Paul wrote: >Hi guys, > >I have recently inherited a 30+ strong network that only uses static >routing!!! Some of the equipment includes 2900s 3500s 3600s 4000s amongst >others. I would very much like to move towards dynamic routing!!! What would >you guys suggest? I also believe that the next IOS for the 4006s does not >support EIGRP !!!!! (If i am correct!) > >I am not sure if I should use RIP IGRP etc. Have any of you guys experienced >this before and what would you suggest? > >Kind regards > >Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51611&t=51599 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
