When using CEF on a border internet router with a NAT device behind it, is it best to use per packet or per destination switching?
Per Packet would obviously yield better balancing, but out or order packet delivery might be a problem. Per-destination has the potential to flood one circuit while the others sit idle, and also reduces maximum throughput to one circuit. Does anyone have any other ideas or is BGP really the best solution at this point? Jeff Jarmoc - CCSA, CCNA, MCSE Network Analyst - Grubb & Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54659&t=54659 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
