per destination. Especially if you are dual homed, and NAT two different IP blocks, then the per packet load balancing would be a disaster.
""Jarmoc, Jeff"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > When using CEF on a border internet router with a NAT device behind it, is > it best to use per packet or per destination switching? > > Per Packet would obviously yield better balancing, but out or order packet > delivery might be a problem. Per-destination has the potential to flood one > circuit while the others sit idle, and also reduces maximum throughput to > one circuit. Does anyone have any other ideas or is BGP really the best > solution at this point? > > Jeff Jarmoc - CCSA, CCNA, MCSE > Network Analyst - Grubb & Ellis > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54673&t=54659 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
