Kewl. I have not seen this yet. Thank you for the link. So the config-synch is no longer recommended.
Sorry Joe, I thought we might be talking about the same thing. Thanks for the updates!! > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Usa [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 2:39 PM > To: Larson, Chris; 'Joseph Ezerski'; 'Chris'; 'Tim O'Brien'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 6509 w/2 SUP2/MSFC2 and FlexWAN > > Single Redundancy Mode is a better choice. This is what TAC is > recommending now. The configuration is much simpler and there will be no > need for HSRP. Here is a link on SRM for additional info. the word is > HA/Config Sync was a work around until SRM comes out for those wanting > instant failover between MSFCs as well as ease of configuration. > > > gd/redund.htm#xtocid1228929> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Larson, Chris > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:15 AM > To: 'Joseph Ezerski'; 'Chris'; 'Tim O'Brien'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 6509 w/2 SUP2/MSFC2 and FlexWAN > > That is what I said. Eiterh configure it using the high availability > config > synch > ie. (this IS SRM configuration) > > interface vlan 2 > ip add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary ip add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x > standby ip x.x.x.x secondary standby ip x.x.x.x x.x.x.x > > > interface flexwan(ATM0) > ip add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x secondary ip add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x > > > Or you configure the active MSFC with flexwan. Failover, configure > the > secondary MSFC with the flexwan. Then fail back. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joseph Ezerski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:20 PM > > To: 'Chris'; 'Tim O'Brien'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: 6509 w/2 SUP2/MSFC2 and FlexWAN > > > > I think what Chris wrote is not quite the full story. I am > currently > > using > > a SUP1A and MSFC1 with a Flexwan card. We are also using > > single-router-mode, which is the Cisco recommended way of > implementing > > redundancy in the Cat6509. With SRM, you can configure everything > you > > need > > on the DR and, anytime you do a write, all configs will transfer > to the > > NDR. In the event of a failure, the Flexwan will be recognized by > the > > second MSFC when it assumes the DR duties. > > > > HTH > > > > -Joe > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On > Behalf Of > > Chris > > Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 1:56 PM > > To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 6509 w/2 SUP2/MSFC2 and FlexWAN > > > > > > You either have to use the high availability config synch config > options. > > ie. > > > > Interface lvan 2 > > ip add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x standby ip add x.x.x.x x.x.x.x > > > > or you have to config everything on the active including the > Flexwan, fail > > it over and config everything on the standby including Flexwan > then fail > > it > > back. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim O'Brien" > > To: ; > > Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 3:17 PM > > Subject: OT: 6509 w/2 SUP2/MSFC2 and FlexWAN > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am working on a high availability solution for a single 6509. > The > > > customer currently has a 6509 with dual SUP 2's and dual > MSFC2/PFC2's. > > > This box also has a FlexWAN module and I am having some > difficulty > > > locating any useful information on Cisco's new site about > setting this > > > up with some high availability or redundancy. When I configure > the > > > MSFC's like normal with HSRP on all of the VLAN interfaces only > the MSFC > > > in the active SUP can see the FlexWAN module and serial ports. > They do > > > not even show up on the second MSFC. Is there a "Ciscoized" way > to set > > > this up? > > > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > > > Tim > > > > _____ > > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56845&t=56845 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
