I agree with Steven, SAN's are really good to address a need, but for
smaller companies, having all your storage eggs in one basket can
(potentially) be a problem. 

I have done some work for a company that uses ESA10000's, the old SCSI
based storage works units. They had a few troubles with one of them,
which has the data volumes for Exchange, the file server, database
server etc etc. When that baby went down, so did EVERYTHING else.

I guess it is a trade off between funcitonalty and risk.

Symon




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56887&t=56857
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to