This is an example of an interface where this router is a DROTHER and is
adjacent with only the DR and BDR while being a neighbor with 6 other
routers. Note the line that reads    Neighbor Count is 8, Adjacent neighbor
count is 2.


Vlan201 is up, line protocol is up
  Internet Address x.x.x.x, Area 201
  Process ID 100, Router ID 172.20.201.6, Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 1
  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DROTHER, Priority 1
  Designated Router (ID) 172.20.201.3, Interface address x.x.x.x
  Backup Designated router (ID) 172.20.201.5, Interface address x.x.x.x
  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
    Hello due in 00:00:06
  Index 7/7, flood queue length 0
  Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
  Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 49
  Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 4 msec
  Neighbor Count is 8, Adjacent neighbor count is 2
    Adjacent with neighbor 172.20.201.5  (Backup Designated Router)
    Adjacent with neighbor 172.20.201.3  (Designated Router)
  Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)

Hope this helps.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
The Long and Winding Road
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 4:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSPF state [7:60572]


""Peter van Oene""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 06:24 PM 1/8/2003 +0000, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >""Jenny McLeod""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > As well as "show ip ospf neighbour" suggested below, "show ip ospf
int"
> is
> > > worth looking at.
> > >
> > > TLaWR, I think you've had a brain fade.  Routers can be neighbours but
> not
> > > adjacent.  But you knew that?
> >
> >
> >Is this one of those "tree falling in the forest" questions? I personally
> >don't consider that two OSPF routers can have a "neighbor" relationship
> >without being adjacent. Call me one of those retentive types.
> >
> >I am always willing to learn. So how would to OSPF routers be neighbors
if
> >they are not adjacent? I appreciate they can be on the same link, just
like
> >my own neighbors live on the same street. That doesn't mean there is a
> >relationship.
>
> Routers on a multi-access segment where a DR and BDR exist may be
> neighbors, but not form an adjacency.  All the non DR/BDR routers will not
> become adjacent with one another, however they will still be neighbors.
>
> I think you knew this already though :)


OK. kinda like in my "neighborhood" where all of us live on the same block,
but most of us don't talk to eachother?  ;->


>
> Pete
>
>
>
> > >
> > > JMcL
> > >
> > > The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ""John Brandis""  wrote in message
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > can you tell I am having fun with OSPF ??
> > > > > Any way, I am playing with OSPF on different network types. I
> > > > wish to see
> > > > if
> > > > > i have a full adjacency or if I have only acheieved a neigbor
> > > > state on
> > > > > certain types of networks. Where, can I find what state I am
> > > > currently in,
> > > > > and what router is the DR/BDR. At moment, I am on point-point
> > > > link and I
> > > > am
> > > > > expecting not to see any election of DR/BDR.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > show ip ospf neighbor
> > > > show ip ospf neighbor detail
> > > >
> > > > can add ip addresses in there to see just a single neighbor.
> > > >
> > > > I'm a bit confused, though, by what you mean when you say
> > > > "neighbor state"
> > > > versus "adjacency" If you don't have adjacency, you don't have
> > > > anything. (
> > > > don't got adjacency, you don't got s**t, as they say in the
> > > > hood )
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks all.
> > > > >
> > > > > jb
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
**********************************************************************
> > > > >
> > > > > visit http://www.solution6.com
> > > > >
> > > > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
**********************************************************************
> > > > >
> > > > > The Solution 6 Head Office and Branch in Sydney is moving
> > > > premises.
> > > > >
> > > > > From Monday 25th November our Head Office and NSW Branch will
> > > > be located
> > > > at:
> > > > >
> > > > > Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.
> > > > >
> > > > > General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666
> > > > >
> > > > > General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
**********************************************************************
> > > > >
> > > > > This email message (and attachments) may contain information
> > > > that is
> > > > > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended
> > > > recipient you
> > > > cannot
> > > > > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such
> > > > a case,
> > > > please
> > > > > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all
> > > > copies of the
> > > > > message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and other
> > > > information in
> > > > > this message and attachments that do not relate to the
> > > > official business
> > > > of
> > > > > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
*********************************************************************




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60761&t=60572
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to