Yes--thanks. Of course, that's what I meant but didn't say, in the third paragraph, though I did say it in the first.
--Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Mietchen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 3:37 PM > To: Larry Sanger > Cc: Citizendium general project announcement list; > Citizendium editors announcement list > Subject: Re: [Citizendium-editors] CZ's GFDL-licensed content > now available under CC-by-sa > > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Larry > Sanger<[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > > > I understand that it has been made possible to relicense GFDL using > > CC-by-sa. In other words, the material that we wrote (in > particular, > > that we added to Wikipedia articles) using the GFDL can > also be made > > available under CC-by-sa. > > > > There has been no serious objection to our doing so. No > one on the CZ > > Executive Committee, which takes responsibility for legal > questions, > > had any objections. > > > > Therefore, I hereby declare that the articles previously licensed > > solely using CC-by-sa are *also* now available under the GFDL. > It should have been the other way round - what was once GFDL > is now also CC-BY-SA. > > > > > If this needs further clarification, let me know. Please > feel free to > > update the relevant CZ pages! > > > > --Larry > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Citizendium-editors mailing list > [email protected] > > https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-editors > > > _______________________________________________ Citizendium-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
