Dear Doc:
And now you raise another question: Why did the cittern change from an
instrument with a very shallow body, tapering to the tailpiece, to a much
deeper body of uniform depth. How did that change affect the quality of
sound and its projection? What was the musical purpose behind that change?
Cheers,
Jim
doc rossi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[email protected]
t> cc:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re:
waldzither]
03/03/2005 12:58
AM
> Also, is there any connection between the Waldzither and the "bell
> citterns" of a slightly earlier era?
>
This is a great question, James, and one that I think always brings out
a tendency to compartmentalize. The way I see it, the cittern went
through a lot of shapes and sizes, and tunings, one of them being a
bell shape. It also got deeper over the years, and the string length
changed along with tuning schemes. I see the history or, shall we say
"development", of the instrument as part of a continuum, but a zig-zag
continuum rather than a linear one.
Doc
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
- [Fwd: Re: waldzither] David Kilpatrick
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] James A Stimson
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] Frank Nordberg
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] doc rossi
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] Frank Nordberg
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] David Kilpatrick
- Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] James A Stimson
- Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] s.walsh
- RE: Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] Rob MacKillop
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] David Kilpatrick
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] s.walsh
- Re: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] doc rossi
- Re: RE: [Fwd: Re: waldzither] s.walsh
