The point is, that these people did not respect an agreement they signed.
They chose to breed to make money - nobody pushed them.  As sole owners.
would they have listened to someone, when they did not respect an agreement
they already made? Not likely.

The non-breeding agreement is to prevent the registration of puppies from
dogs that are not felt to be suitable to include in the Cavalier gene pool
as examples of the breed  (ie pet quality,etc.).  In this case it sounds
like it would have worked.

The non breeding agreement may need to include an agreement to neuter - with
proof.  Some breeders do not sell until dogs are neutered.  There are some
people who are profit oriented enough to use a dog which is on a
non-breeding, and use another dogs registration for registering puppies.
Unfortunately you cannot guarantee against everything, you can only try.

A co-ownership is generally useful for a different purpose.

> Hi List
>          I really don't want to continue this but I must observe that if
> these people bred a cavalier to a Maltese, obviously the puppies couldn't
> be registered and therefore no signatures were needed. Co-owning couldn't
> protect against this kind of ridiculous breeding. >          However, IF
the bitch hadn't been co-owned to begin with and IF> its owner wanted to
breed it - perhaps they would have bred it to a> cavalier and perhaps they
would have asked an experienced person for advice and guidance. Just maybe
it was the co-ownership with all its limitations> and restrictions that
helped push these misguided people into breeding to a> Maltese in the first
place

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.

Reply via email to