I understand your frustration. I did originally say that I didn't mind private responses or even anonymous ones from fake e-mail addresses since my intention is not to judge. Imagine my frustration when I see an inbox full of "response to stud dog survey" in the subject line and I think... great everyone is going to share, how wonderful! I should've known better by now...oh well the perpetual optimist. Then, it turns out to be a whole discussion on antibiotics, which I don't mind, it is still an educational discussion.
I really think that implying, stating, hinting etc. that someone's breeding practices and or choices are wrong in anyone shape or form is counterproductive. There's nothing wrong with saying, " I require all bitches to eat Lime flavored jello before being bred to my stud because everyone knows that green m&m's are lucky but dogs shouldn't have chocolate so therefore, lime flavored jello is best." One can disagree with that and state what they do or don't do and why but it doesn't need to be done in a negative fashion. Terrie:) who's popping green m&m's instead of Prozac Myra Savant wrote: > Incidentally, Terrie, do you now see why you only got four or five responses > originally? This > entire thread is a perfect example. When someone responds, it then > becomes lunch for the next day or so while people snack on you and your > kennel practices. Myra Savant ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.
