In a message dated 5/13/2002 1:58:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Myra, I believe the reason for requiring spay/neuter contracts on those the > bitches owner doesn't keep is that we are or should be responsible for all > progeny produced by our boys as well as our girls I think there should be some contingency in the contract to allow the bitch's owner to sell one or more of the puppies to someone as a show prospect. I suppose if you were selling that puppy in a co-ownership situation you would be technically "keeping" the puppy. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glenn Fulton Cincinnati/Mason permission to forward granted ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
