In a message dated 8/21/2002 8:31:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> Shouting "mandatory testing" over and over again is
> NOT a position that anyone can understand

I understand it.  And I think it could work if everyone wanted it to.  You
CAN have mandatory testing and still leave the decisions in the hands of the
breeders and in fact really not change any freedoms in decision a breeder now
has.  Mandatory testing means you have to test it does not mean you have to
impose with it restrictions that say IF the test says XYZ then you can not do
ABC etc etc.  All it says is you have to test.  The public gets to know what
the test says.  You can then make all of the same decisions you would today
with nothing in place.

In this scenario what scares the breeder?  It certainly can not be the
limiting of decisions because in the above scenario there is no change in the
authority of the breeder to make decisions.  Is it because they might make
decisions people would question?  What better opportunity to gain a chance to
explain to those not as up on genetics and breeding why a decision was made.
Raise the education level of everyone.  Is it because some might cheat and
beat the system?  That sort of sounds like my kids.... well he didn't have to
do it... he cheated... so why do I?  Why? Because you are more eithical then
the cheater and every ethical participant helps the breed.  Someones doctor
might be better then someone elses, someone might test until they find a
doctor with the results they want, yada, yada, yada.  This is no different
then what happens today.  The only difference is what IS done is visible to
everyone in an easy manner.   It makes comparative shopping easier.  It
creates peer pressure.  When people have to explain their choices in the
public eye it creates responsibility for actions which I don't think exist
today.  What makes me nervous about this.... is it makes too many breeders
nervous.... which makes me wonder what they want to hide.  Remember I'm not
saying change any action or right to decision.  I"m just saying make it
public.  Whats the fear?

Mandatory testing CAN work but it would have to have a lot of support and it
clearly does not.  Too many Don't want it.  Some for fear of what it will
lead to, others for fear of being exposed, and some for just plain fear of
the unknown.  Mainly it appears to be an issue of mistrust all around.  I am
sure some of these fears are justified.  After all it seems the Cavalier
contingent in the USA is very split, very untrusting of each other, littered
with politics, and even has a smattering of questionable ethics in some of
those involved.  In this environment Mandatory testing very likely would not
turn out the way some think it will.  It could turn out to cause as many
issues as it solves.  Not because it is Mandatory testing.  Because everyone
does not want to see it enacted, nor succeed, nor will they support it.

So I say again.  What are the alternatives?  How do we enforce increased
ethics, increased health testing, and increased ease and availability of
information to the public?  I can't believe there are no ways to do this.  In
lieu (probably spelled wrong but I knew it wasn't lou)  of Mandatory testing
I say mandatory disclosure.  Lets start there.

The "I'll be damned if you are going to tell ME what to do" attitude is not a
cooperative mindset that will reap no benefit for anyone.

Dave
CastleMyst Cavaliers
http://members.aol.com/CMystCavs

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to