In a message dated Tue, 1 Oct 2002 7:23:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> dave, > you cant make a blanket statement like this. not all dogs that are handled > by handlers are not deserving. by the same token, we can also say that there > are plenty of owner handled dogs that do not deserve to win > either. and ive > seen that far too many times. > claudia Claudia you misinterpreted my statement. I was not making any statement at all in reference to the worthyness of the dog as you said there are worthy and unworthy shown by all ranks. I was trying to compare the degree of accomplishment for those who show in bred by, those who do all the work and owner handle, and those who hire a pro handler and do nothing but write the check. What I said (or tried to) was that finishing a dog on an pro handler is NO ACCOMPLISHMENT for the owner as they do nothing but write a check to earn that title. They don't groom, train, or handle in most cases. The handler does all the work. Dave CastleMyst Cavaliers http://members.aol.com/CMystCavs ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
