Peter writes:
> This is where I see the need for "CPU sets". I.e. as a
> replacement/modification to the CPU affinity mechanism
Note that despite the name, cpusets handles both CPU and
Memory affinity.
Which is probably why Hubertus is calling them cpumem sets.
And, indeed, why I have called them cpumemsets on alternate
years myself.
However the rest of your points, except where clearly specific
to the scheduler, apply equally well, so this point is not
critical at this point in the discussion.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.650.933.1373
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
