Tim wrote:
> 7 years ago, before cpus_allowed was dreamed up, I proposed a pset patch
One more thing ... the original message from Simon and Sylvain that I
first saw a year ago announcing their cpuset work, which is the basis
for the current cpuset patch in Andrew's tree, began with the lines:
> From: Simon Derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:59:01 +0200 (DFT)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc: Sylvain Jeaugey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We have developped a new feature in the Linux kernel, controlling CPU
> placements, which are useful on large SMP machines, especially NUMA ones.
> We call it CPUSETS, and we would highly appreciate to know about anyone
> who would be interested in such a feature. This has been somewhat inspired
> by the pset or cpumemset patches existing for Linux 2.4.
So I guess Tim, you (pset) and I (cpumemset) can both claim to
have developed anticedents of this current cpuset proposal.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.650.933.1373
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
