> Martin wrote: >> I don't think anyone is suggesting that either system as is could replace >> the other ... > > I'm pretty sure Andrew was suggesting this. > > He began this thread addressing me with the statement: >> >> And CKRM is much more general than the cpu/memsets code, and hence it >> should be possible to realize your end-users requirements using an
Note especially the last line: >> appropriately modified CKRM, and a suitable controller. So not CKRM as-is ... M. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
