Martin writes:
>
> One doesn't need to completely subsume the other ;-)

Well, close to it.

It's not a marriage of equals in his challenge:
>
> And CKRM is much more general than the cpu/memsets code, and hence it
> should be possible to realize your end-users requirements using an
> appropriately modified CKRM, and a suitable controller.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.650.933.1373


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to