Hi , 1.CKRM Patches are based on mainline kernel sources structure.
Redhat sources are organized in a very different
way.
True but the rejects should be relatively small atleast for the core part - CKRM modifies very few existing kernel files, most of the changes are in new files created.
There's no way to avoid spending some time on this. We will not be able to devote any time to providing a Redhat port currently.
2. Some files like fs/exec.c are not present.
Patching seems to fail at many places.
?? Redhat sources don't have fs/exec.c ? Could you check again ?
3. Is Redhat planning to add CKRM in near future.
If yes , when ?
Thats a question we'd like to know too :-)
-- Shailabh
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
