On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 09:44 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > As Chandra noted, this was not really the point of the exercise.
All that Chandra said is that you have to make sure that the classes aren't providing any extra resource *restrictions*. That's fine, I just want to see the overhead of the class management itself. Can you create classes that have all of their restrictions set to DONTCARE? > The problem is, I don't see the utility of adding 1000s of > classes without it representing an actual usage model. I think 100 classes is probably reasonable. That's on the scale of what cpu(mem)sets plans to do. 1000 is more of a "does this get pathological" number. > If you can give me a good way to automatically create all the > classes, I would be happy to try, though. Heh. I've never even *compiled* ckrm :) -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
