On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 15:39 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:49:47AM -0700, Matthew Helsley wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6.12-rc3/kernel/ckrm/ckrm_tc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.12-rc3.orig/kernel/ckrm/ckrm_tc.c 2005-05-13
> > 20:01:48.846410256 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.12-rc3/kernel/ckrm/ckrm_tc.c 2005-05-13 20:05:52.533364208
> > -0700
> > @@ -33,10 +33,12 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/ckrm_rc.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/ckrm_tc.h>
> >
> > +#define TASK_EXIT_CLASS ((void*)-1)
> > +
>
> Matt,
> can you move this to ckrm_rc.h and use it in the definition of
> ckrm_get_res_class() ( I think you covered all the other usages with this
> patch).
>
> thanks
>
> chandra
I like your point, but I'm not sure it belongs there. Do we really want
to stuff Taskclass classtype-specific definitions in there? Wouldn't
ckrm_tc.h be more appropriate?
Cheers,
-Matt
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
