On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:57 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: Interesting idea....
But I am currently working on removing the classtype support in order to reduce the complexity ( it was one of the main problem the community sees with CKRM). We will see how it shapes up :) chandra > Hi, > > Has anyone considered using CKRM to implement a "directory" classtype, > that would allow you to track/limit I/O and space usage for a set of > directory hierarchies? Similar to Linux disk quotas (maybe even using > the existing disk quota hooks?), but on a hierarchy basis rather than > a per-group/user basis. > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > ckrm-tech mailing list > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
