On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:22:17 +1000 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It could have come a long way since then, but this code looks > much neater than the code I reviewed. I'm glad to hear that! But the cpu resource controller has some problems, for example: - The controller only controls the time_slice value and doesn't care the balance of cpus (the controller leaves balancing to the existing balancing code in the scheduler). So far I don't have any good idea to solve this. - The controller holds a spinlock once per 1 second. I don't know this is permissive or not, but the current scheduler doesn't hold any spinlocks normally, so... -- KUROSAWA, Takahiro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
