On Friday 02 June 2006 04:43, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:04 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > - disk I/O bandwidth: > > > we started to use CFQv2, but it is quite poor in this regard. First, it > > > doesn't prioritizes writes and async disk operations :( And even for > > > sync reads we found some problems we work on now... > > CKRM (on e-series) had an implementation based on a modified CFQ > scheduler. Shailabh is currently working on porting that controller to > f-series.
I hope that the changes you have to improve CFQ were done in a way that is suitable for mainline and you're planning to try and merge them there. -- -ck _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
