Peter Williams wrote: >>>> >>>>The problem is that with per-task caps, if I have a resource group A >>>>and I want to limit it to 10%, I need to limit each task in resource >>>>group A to 10% (which makes resource groups not so useful). Is my >>>>understanding correct? >>> >>> >>>Well the general idea is correct but your maths is wrong. You'd have >>>to give each of them a cap somewhere between 10% and 10% divided by >>>the number of tasks in group A. Exactly where in that range would >>>vary depending on the CPU demand of each task and would need to be >>>adjusted dynamically (unless they were very boring tasks whose demands >>>were constant over time). >>> >> >> >>Hmm.. I thought my math was reasonable (but there is always so much to >>learn) >> From your formula, if I have 1 task in group A, I need to provide it with >>a cap of b/w 10 to 11%. For two tasks, I need to give them b/w 10 to 10.5%. >>If I have a hundred, it needs to be b/w 10% and 10.01% > > > Now your arithmetic is failing you. According to my formula: > > 1. With one task in group A you give it 10% which is what you get when > you divide 10% by one. > > 2. With two tasks in group A you give them each somewhere between 5% > (which is 10% divided by 2) and 10%. If they are equally busy you give > them each 5% and if they are not equally busy you give them you give > them larger caps.
Yes, I understand. I misinterpreted what you said earlier. I see you clearly meant the range [cap_of_the_group/number_of_tasks, cap_of_the_group] > > Another, probably a better but more expensive, formula is to divide the > 10% between them in proportion to their demand. Being careful not to > give any of them a zero cap, of course. I.e. in the two task 10% case > they each get 5% if they are equally busy but if one is twice as busy as > the other it gets a 6.6% cap and the other gets 3.3% (approximately). > Yes, that makes a lot of sense > Peter Thanks for clarifying. -- Balbir Singh, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech