Kirill Korotaev wrote: >>"nice" seems to be doing quite nicely :-) >> >> >I'm sorry, but nice never looked "nice" to me. >Have you ever tried to "nice" apache server which spawns 500 >processes/threads on a loaded machine? >With nice you _can't_ impose limits or priority on the whole "apache". >The more apaches you have the more useless their priorites and nices are... > >
Yes but interactive admin processes will still get a large bonus relative to the apache processes so you can still log in and kill the apache storm off even with very large loads. Sam. _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
