On Tuesday 06 June 2006 18:24, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >>I'm sorry, but nice never looked "nice" to me. > >>Have you ever tried to "nice" apache server which spawns 500 > >>processes/threads on a loaded machine? > >>With nice you _can't_ impose limits or priority on the whole "apache". > >>The more apaches you have the more useless their priorites and nices > >> are... > > > > Yes but interactive admin processes will still get a large bonus > > relative to the apache processes so you can still log in and kill the > > apache storm off even with very large loads. > > And how do you plan to manage it: to log in every time when apache works > too much and kill processes? The managabiliy of such solutions sucks..
What a strange discussion. I simply impose limits on processes and connections on my grossly underpowered server. /me shrugs -- -ck _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
