MAEDA Naoaki wrote: >> Ok, so that's not as bad as it looked. So, while it is still O(N), the >> fact that it is O(N/HZ) makes this not a problem until you get to >> possibly impractical levels of runqueue length. >> > > Do you mean N is the size of the loop? for_each_cpu_mask() loops > the number of CPUs times. It is not directly related to runqueue length. >
Ok, I mistook it for a per-task loop. Well, let me know if you think it's worth trying it out anyway. Sam. _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
